Gress Lumber Co. v. Georgia Pine Shingle Co.

32 S.E. 632, 105 Ga. 847, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 791
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 4, 1899·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

1. A deed is presumably executed at the place named in its caption; but that it was not there executed is shown when the attestation clause recites another place at which it was signed, sealed, and delivered.

Argued November 18,1898. Decided March 4, 1899. Petition for injunction. Before Judge’ Smith. Wilcox superior court. August 2, 1898. W. A. Hawkins, C. J. Haden and H. D. Graham, for plaintiff. 8. T. Kingsbery, Gutts & Lawson and J. H. Martin, for defendants.

2. So far as regards validity of execution, it is immaterial upon what part of a deed the attestation clause is written and signed by a witness, if, from inspection of the instrument,-it appears beyond question that it was the purpose of the witness to attest the signature of the maker. It follows that the deeds in question must be held, to have been duly executed and attested, and it was error to reject them, when offered in evidence, because of the want of legal execution.

Judgvhent reversed.

Ail the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gress Lumber Co. v. Georgia Pine Shingle Co., 32 S.E. 632, 105 Ga. 847, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 791 (Ga. 1899).

32 S.E. 632 (Gress Lumber Co. v. Georgia Pine Shingle Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
161 P. 334 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1916)
Heard v. State
39 S.E. 118 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Bray v. Walker
37 S.E. 370 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Cleveland v. State
34 S.E. 572 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)