Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.
996 A.2d 1065, 606 Pa. 232, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1373
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 24, 2010
Docket35 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 996 A.2d 1065 (Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P., 996 A.2d 1065, 606 Pa. 232, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1373 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
*233 ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of June 2010, the Petition of Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Superior Court err in its interpretation and application of Section 385 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.
33 A.3d 594 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Henry v. Commonwealth
996 A.2d 1065 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
996 A.2d 1065, 606 Pa. 232, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gresik-v-pa-partners-lp-pa-2010.