Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.

996 A.2d 1065, 606 Pa. 232, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1373

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 24, 2010·No. 35 WAL 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*233 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of June 2010, the Petition of Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in its interpretation and application of Section 385 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*233 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of June 2010, the Petition of Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in its interpretation and application of Section 385 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P., 996 A.2d 1065, 606 Pa. 232, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1373 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

996 A.2d 1065 (Gresik v. PA Partners, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related