Gresham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gresham v. State

13 S.E.2d 45, 64 Ga. App. 264, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 2

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 20, 1941·No. 28588.·Published

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

Will Gresham was convicted of possessing liquor in violation of the revenue tax act to legalize and control alcoholic beverages and liquors. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, the exceptions to the charge to the jury are not meritorious, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., poneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacIntyre, J.

Will Gresham was convicted of possessing liquor in violation of the revenue tax act to legalize and control alcoholic beverages and liquors. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, the exceptions to the charge to the jury are not meritorious, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Gardner, J., poneur.

Gresham v. State, 13 S.E.2d 45, 64 Ga. App. 264, 1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 2 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

13 S.E.2d 45 (Gresham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.