Gresham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gresham v. State

162 S.E. 876, 44 Ga. App. 773, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 493

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

Docket21949

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 876 (Gresham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gresham v. State, 162 S.E. 876, 44 Ga. App. 773, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 493 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and. is not of such a character as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and. is not of such a character as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 S.E. 876, 44 Ga. App. 773, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gresham-v-state-gactapp-1932.