Gresham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gresham v. State

111 S.E. 687, 28 Ga. App. 501, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 640

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gresham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Ga. App. 779 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1922·No. 13233·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. When the exceptions to the charge of the court are considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, no harmful error is shown.

2. The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no material error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. When the exceptions to the charge of the court are considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, no harmful error is shown.

2. The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no material error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.

Gresham v. State, 111 S.E. 687, 28 Ga. App. 501, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 640 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

111 S.E. 687 (Gresham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.