Gresham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gresham v. State

111 S.E. 687, 28 Ga. App. 501, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 640

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1922

Docket13233

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 687 (Gresham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gresham v. State, 111 S.E. 687, 28 Ga. App. 501, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 640 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. When the exceptions to the charge of the court are considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, no harmful error is shown.

2. The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no material error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. When the exceptions to the charge of the court are considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, no harmful error is shown.

2. The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and no material error of law appearing, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 687, 28 Ga. App. 501, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gresham-v-state-gactapp-1922.