Gresham v. Gresham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Gresham v. Gresham

27 So. 2d 876, 248 Ala. 393

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 21, 1946·No. 7 Div. 888.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FOSTER, Justice.

We agree with the trial court that the custody of the child should for the present remain with Mildred Gresham, appellee, the mother of a small boy. We do not think the evidence is at all satisfactory that she is nut a fit and suitable person for his custody, but think that the court properly awarded the custody to her, stating that it was for the present.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LAWSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, Justice.

We agree with the trial court that the custody of the child should for the present remain with Mildred Gresham, appellee, the mother of a small boy. We do not think the evidence is at all satisfactory that she is nut a fit and suitable person for his custody, but think that the court properly awarded the custody to her, stating that it was for the present.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LAWSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Gresham v. Gresham, 27 So. 2d 876, 248 Ala. 393 (Ala. 1946).

Pincite

27 So. 2d 876 (Gresham v. Gresham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related