Gresham v. First National Bank
72 S.E. 279, 9 Ga. App. 814, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 338
Opinion
. There was sufficient conflict in the inferences to be drawn from testimony to make a question for solution by the jury, as tc whether the plaintiff was a bona,fide holder of the notes sued on, for value, and without notice of dishonor; and the court erred in directing the verdict. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gresham v. First National Bank, 72 S.E. 279, 9 Ga. App. 814, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
72 S.E. 279 (Gresham v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.