Gresham v. First National Bank
72 S.E. 279, 9 Ga. App. 814, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 338
This text of 72 S.E. 279 (Gresham v. First National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gresham v. First National Bank, 72 S.E. 279, 9 Ga. App. 814, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
. There was sufficient conflict in the inferences to be drawn from testimony to make a question for solution by the jury, as tc whether the plaintiff was a bona,fide holder of the notes sued on, for value, and without notice of dishonor; and the court erred in directing the verdict. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 279, 9 Ga. App. 814, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gresham-v-first-national-bank-gactapp-1911.