Grennan v. Cirillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grennan v. Cirillo

298 A.D.2d 429, 748 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 298 A.D.2d 429 (Grennan v. Cirillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grennan v. Cirillo, 298 A.D.2d 429, 748 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants John R. Cirillo and Darcy E. Cirillo appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered October 15, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and the defendant All Seasons Transportation, Inc., separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the same ground.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ respective motions. In response to the defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Wertheimer v Paley, 137 AD2d 680), the medical tests and reports of the plaintiff’s experts raised triable issues of material fact (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants John R. Cirillo and Darcy E. Cirillo appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered October 15, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and the defendant All Seasons Transportation, Inc., separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the same ground.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ respective motions. In response to the defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Wertheimer v Paley, 137 AD2d 680), the medical tests and reports of the plaintiff’s experts raised triable issues of material fact (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345). Florio, J.P., O’Brien, Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 429, 748 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grennan-v-cirillo-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack