Grendall v. Town of Frankfort
This text of 547 A.2d 635 (Grendall v. Town of Frankfort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Preston Grendall appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, Waldo County, dismissing his complaint for insufficiency of process. Grendall contends that a summons issued by a clerk of a Massachusetts court may be used to initiate an action in the Maine Superior Court or, in the alternative, that he was entitled to equitable relief under M.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Because 4 M.R.S. A. § 108 (1979) requires that Superior Court summonses “be in the name of the State [of Maine] under the seal of said court” and because Grendall’s 60(b) motion sets forth no ground for equitable relief, we affirm the dismissal.
The entry is:
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 A.2d 635, 1988 Me. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grendall-v-town-of-frankfort-me-1988.