Grenadier v. Gorman

702 F. App'x 175
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2017·No. No. 17-1540, No. 17-1573, No. 17-1710, No. 17-1737·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Wolk Grenadier and George Edward McDermott appeal the district court’s orders dismissing Grenadier’s bankruptcy appeals and denying McDer-mott’s motions to intervene and to confirm. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. Gorman, No. 1:16-cv-01461-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 3 & May 5, 2017); McDermott, No. 1:16-cv-01461-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2017); Grenadier v. Heckman, No. 1:16-cv-01448-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. May 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grenadier v. Gorman, 702 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2017).

702 F. App'x 175 (Grenadier v. Gorman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.