Grenadier v. Gorman

702 F. App'x 175
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1540, No. 17-1573, No. 17-1710, No. 17-1737
StatusPublished

This text of 702 F. App'x 175 (Grenadier v. Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grenadier v. Gorman, 702 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Wolk Grenadier and George Edward McDermott appeal the district court’s orders dismissing Grenadier’s bankruptcy appeals and denying McDer-mott’s motions to intervene and to confirm. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. Gorman, No. 1:16-cv-01461-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 3 & May 5, 2017); McDermott, No. 1:16-cv-01461-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2017); Grenadier v. Heckman, No. 1:16-cv-01448-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. May 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
702 F. App'x 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grenadier-v-gorman-ca4-2017.