Grenadier v. BWW Law Group
This text of 612 F. App'x 190 (Grenadier v. BWW Law Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaint and denying her motion for reconsideration We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB, 2015 WL 417839 (E.D.Va. Jan. 30 & Feb. 19, 2015). We deny Grenadier’s motion to vacate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F. App'x 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grenadier-v-bww-law-group-ca4-2015.