Grenadier ex rel. United States v. Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Grenadier ex rel. United States v. Virginia

696 F. App'x 637

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2017·No. No. 17-1335·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Edward McDermott appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to intervene and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McDermott v. Virginia, No. 1:17-cv-00166-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Mar. 1 & 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Edward McDermott appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to intervene and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McDermott v. Virginia, No. 1:17-cv-00166-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Mar. 1 & 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Grenadier ex rel. United States v. Virginia, 696 F. App'x 637 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

696 F. App'x 637 (Grenadier ex rel. United States v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.