Grenadeir Parking Corp. v. Landmark Associates
This text of 277 A.D.2d 117 (Grenadeir Parking Corp. v. Landmark Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered April 7, 2000, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Summary judgment was properly denied since the evidence submitted on the motion raises an issue of fact as to whether the deteriorated condition of the floors and surfaces of the subject premises is attributable to improper construction of the premises and consequently necessitates repairs properly deemed structural, or to plaintiff tenant’s failure to maintain the premises, in which case the required repairs would be of a non-structural sort. Although defendant landlord, relying on various provisions of the parties’ lease, contends that plaintiff bears responsibility for repairing the premises regardless of whether the needed repairs are structural or non-structural, the lease provisions cited by defendant do not clearly allocate the parties’ respective repair obligations in the manner urged and extrinsic evidence is necessary to resolve this issue (see, Burger King Corp. v 111 Cedar St. Co., 188 AD2d 379). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Ellerin, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 117, 716 N.Y.S.2d 300, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grenadeir-parking-corp-v-landmark-associates-nyappdiv-2000.