Greitzer v. Johns-Manville Corporation

710 F.2d 127, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18253
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 1982
Docket81-1379
StatusPublished

This text of 710 F.2d 127 (Greitzer v. Johns-Manville Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Greitzer v. Johns-Manville Corporation, 710 F.2d 127, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18253 (4th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

710 F.2d 127

GREITZER & LOCKS, Gene Locks and Martin Greitzer; Neil R.
Peterson, Appellants,
v.
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION and Johns-Manville Sales
Corporation; Raybestos-Manhatten, Inc.; Eagle-Picher
Industries, Inc.; Unarco Industries, Inc.; Fibreboard
Corporation; H.K. Porter Company; Southern Textile
Corporation; Pittsburgh Corning Corporation; The Celotex
Corporation; Keene Corporation, Appellees,
United States of America, Amicus Curiae.
Virginia Asbestos Plaintiffs, Amicus Curiae.

No. 81-1379.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 8, 1982.
Decided June 17, 1982.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk & Newport. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge.

Robert C. Nusbaum, Norfolk, Va. (Hofheimer, Nusbaum, McPaul & Brenner, Norfolk, Va., on brief) for appellants.

C. Michael Montgomery, C. Grigsby Scifres, Norfolk, Va. (Seawell, Dalton, Hughes & Timms, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for Johns-Manville Corp. and Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

Archibald Wallace, III, Richmond, Va. (Albert D. Bugg, Jr., Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, Va., on brief) for H.K. Porter Co., Inc. & Southern Textile Corp.

(William V. Hoyle, Charles A. Smith, Philip S. Payne, Hoyle, Corbett, Hubbard, Smith & Payne on brief) for Raybestos-Manhatten, Inc.

(William B. Eley, Eley, Rutherford & Leafe, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.

(Gerard E.W. Voyer, Taylor, Walker & Adams, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for Unarco Industries, Inc.

(M. Stuart Bateman, Newport News, Va., on brief), for Fibreboard Corp.

(Worth Banner, Reynolds, Smith & Winters, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for Pittsburgh Corp.

(John Y. Pearson, Jr., Bruce T. Bishop, Willcox, Savage, Lawrence, Dickson & Spindle, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for Celotex Corp.

(Henry C. Morgan, Jr., Pender, Coward, Addison & Morgan, Norfolk, Va., on brief) for Keene Corp.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and BUTZNER, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, sitting in banc.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greitzer & Locks v. Johns-Manville Corp.
710 F.2d 127 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 F.2d 127, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greitzer-v-johns-manville-corporation-ca4-1982.