Greiss v. Royal National Bank

293 N.E.2d 827, 31 N.Y.2d 1003, 341 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1488
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 1973·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order modified, with costs to plaintiff-respondent, in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed: The order appealed from should be modified by striking the award of punitive damages. The conduct complained of; hot “aimed at the public generally,” was neither “ so ‘ gross [nor] wanton ’ as to bring it within the class of malfeasances, for which punitive damages may be awarded.” (James v. Powell, 19 N Y 2d 249, 260; see, also, Vinlis Constr. Co. v. Roreck, 27 N Y 2d 687, 689; cf. Walker v. Sheldon, 10 N Y 2d 401, 406.)

[1005]*1005Concur: Chief Judge Fulo and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greiss v. Royal National Bank, 293 N.E.2d 827, 31 N.Y.2d 1003, 341 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1488 (N.Y. 1973).

293 N.E.2d 827 (Greiss v. Royal National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prince v. Gurvitz
57 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Borkowski v. Borkowski
48 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)