Greiss v. Main Line Auto Wash

Third Circuit

Greiss v. Main Line Auto Wash

952 F.2d 1392, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31436, 1991 WL 291163

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 19, 1991

Docket90-1888

StatusPublished

This text of 952 F.2d 1392 (Greiss v. Main Line Auto Wash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Greiss v. Main Line Auto Wash, 952 F.2d 1392, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 31436, 1991 WL 291163 (3d Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

952 F.2d 1392

Greiss (Gamal)
v.
Main Line Auto Wash, Meeham (James), Richards (John H.,
Brad), Andretti Enterprises, Inc., Hanna Car Wash
International, a/k/a Hanna Industries, Peugot, Incorporated,
Budrigh Equipment, Karakelian (Gary), Cacciolla (Frank),
Builder Peugot Motors of America, Inc., a/k/a Peugot,
Incorporated, a/k/a Peugot v. R.E. Mc Connell Associates

NO. 90-1888

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Dec 19, 1991

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Buckwalter, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI