Greiner v. Beck

284 A.D.2d 966, 726 N.Y.S.2d 317, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5846
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by her seven-year-old daughter when she was attacked by a dog owned by defendants. Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof that they lacked any knowledge of the dog’s alleged vicious propensities, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable question of fact on that issue (see, Plennert v Abel, 269 AD2d 796; Perry v Mikolajczyk, 259 AD2d 987). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cos-grove, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Greiner v. Beck, 284 A.D.2d 966, 726 N.Y.S.2d 317, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 966 (Greiner v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pollard v. United Parcel Service
302 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)