Greifenberger v. Pav
This text of 678 N.E.2d 495 (Greifenberger v. Pav) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of appellants’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of [964]*964claim, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 N.E.2d 495, 89 N.Y.2d 963, 655 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greifenberger-v-pav-ny-1997.