Greichel v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
This text of 39 A.D.3d 421 (Greichel v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered November 9, 2005, which annulled respondent’s denial of petitioner’s challenge to a rejection of her application for succession rights to an apartment to the extent of remanding for a hearing to determine whether petitioner resided in the apartment for the required period, and denied respondent’s cross motion to dismiss this proceeding, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, the cross motion granted and the proceeding dismissed.
[422]*422Petitioner did not have the right to succeed to the subject Mitchell-Lama unit upon the death of the tenant of record since it is undisputed that she was not listed on the income affidavits required by the agency and thus could not make the necessary demonstration that the unit was her primary residence (9 NYCRR 1727-8.2 [a] [5]; Matter of Renda v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 22 AD3d 382 [2005]). Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.D.3d 421, 832 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/greichel-v-new-york-state-division-of-housing-community-renewal-nyappdiv-2007.