Gregory Whitaker v. State
This text of Gregory Whitaker v. State (Gregory Whitaker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GREGORY WHITAKER,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-925
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 6, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
Gregory Whitaker, Live Oak, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gregory Whitaker, appeals the summary denial of his motion pursuant
to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Appellant alleged, inter alia,
that trial counsel was ineffective because (1) counsel failed to take any depositions or
otherwise “look into [Appellant’s] case,” and (2) Appellant informed counsel that he was
sick on the morning of trial and that he was therefore unable to think clearly.
Although these claims were facially insufficient as alleged, Appellant was not given
an opportunity to amend his claims. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f). Therefore, we reverse as to these two claims with instructions that the trial court give Appellant an opportunity
to amend. We otherwise affirm.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory Whitaker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-whitaker-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.