Gregory v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gregory v. State

426 S.W.3d 21, 2014 WL 1301880, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 353

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 2014·No. No. ED 100384·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremiah Gregory appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen his Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremiah Gregory appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen his Rule 24.035¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Gregory v. State, 426 S.W.3d 21, 2014 WL 1301880, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 353 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

426 S.W.3d 21 (Gregory v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.