Gregory v. State

943 So. 2d 292, 2006 WL 3422383
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gregory v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 937 So. 2d 180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 2006·No. 3D06-1604·Published

Opinion

943 So.2d 292 (2006)

Andre Odell GREGORY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-1604.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 29, 2006.

Andre Odell Gregory, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and William J. Selinger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

The defendant, Andre Odell Gregory, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The Florida Supreme Court has consistently held that appellate counsel will not be deemed ineffective for failing to raise issues that were not properly raised during trial court proceedings and do not present a question of fundamental error. See Valle v. Moore, 837 So.2d 905, 907-08 (Fla.2002); see also Coney v. State, 937 So.2d 255, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). We, therefore, deny the petition.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory v. State, 943 So. 2d 292, 2006 WL 3422383 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

943 So. 2d 292 (Gregory v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coney v. State
937 So. 2d 255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Valle v. Moore
837 So. 2d 905 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)