Gregory v. Railroad Retirement Board of the United States

201 F.2d 52
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 1952
Docket11503_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 F.2d 52 (Gregory v. Railroad Retirement Board of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory v. Railroad Retirement Board of the United States, 201 F.2d 52 (6th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard this day on the record, the motion to dismiss filed by appellee, and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for both parties;

And it appearing that the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, for the reason • that appellant has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before the Railroad Retirement Board, is well- grounded, see Shelley v. Railroad Retirement Board, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 239, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Though unnecessary to decision, inasmuch as the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, we think it advisable to; say that had this court overruled the motion to dismiss it would have been compelled to decide this case against appellant on the merits, for the reason that the findings of fact upon, which the Appeals Council of the 'Board based its decision are supported by the evidence in the case and are not based on any erroneous application of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank C. Gutierrez v. Railroad Retirement Board
918 F.2d 567 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Alexander Szostak v. Railroad Retirement Board
370 F.2d 253 (Second Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 F.2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-railroad-retirement-board-of-the-united-states-ca6-1952.