Gregory v. Pike

First Circuit

Gregory v. Pike

77 F. 241, 23 C.C.A. 138, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 1896

DocketNo. 195

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 77 F. 241 (Gregory v. Pike) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregory v. Pike, 77 F. 241, 23 C.C.A. 138, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234 (1st Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal, allowed by the circuit court from a decree entered in that comí pursuant to a mandate from this court; and we are now asked by ihe appellee, Mary H. Pike, to dismiss it. It is now said that the decree in the circuit court departs from the mandate in some particulars. The departures were not assigned as errors. No errors were assigned as to anything arising subsequent to the judgment of this court on which the mandate issued, nor was the permission of this court for the present appeal ob tained or asked. Therefore the; principles announced by us in Re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co., 20 C. C. A. 111, 73 Fed. 908, and in Re Pike, where our opinion was passed down September 17, 1896 (76 Fed. 400), govern this case, and compel us to conclude that this appeal will not lie. The appeal is dismissed, with costs in this court for Mary H. Pike incidental to her motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal, allowed by the circuit court from a decree entered in that comí pursuant to a mandate from this court; and we are now asked by ihe appellee, Mary H. Pike, to dismiss it. It is now said that the decree in the circuit court departs from the mandate in some particulars. The departures were not assigned as errors. No errors were assigned as to anything arising subsequent to the judgment of this court on which the mandate issued, nor was the permission of this court for the present appeal ob tained or asked. Therefore the; principles announced by us in Re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co., 20 C. C. A. 111, 73 Fed. 908, and in Re Pike, where our opinion was passed down September 17, 1896 (76 Fed. 400), govern this case, and compel us to conclude that this appeal will not lie. The appeal is dismissed, with costs in this court for Mary H. Pike incidental to her motion to dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 F. 241, 23 C.C.A. 138, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-pike-ca1-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack