Gregory v. Muse

Fourth Circuit

Gregory v. Muse

585 F. App'x 46

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2014·No. No. 14-7124·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Gregory appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gregory v. Muse, No. 3:13-cv-00233-REP, 2014 WL 2967948 (E.D.Va. July 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Gregory appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gregory v. Muse, No. 3:13-cv-00233-REP, 2014 WL 2967948 (E.D.Va. July 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gregory v. Muse, 585 F. App'x 46 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 46 (Gregory v. Muse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related