Gregory v. Headrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gregory v. Headrick

181 S.E. 169, 181 Ga. 5, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 6

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 7, 1935

DocketNo. 10587

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 S.E. 169 (Gregory v. Headrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregory v. Headrick, 181 S.E. 169, 181 Ga. 5, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 6 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

The only assignment of error is upon a judgment overruling the plaintiff's motion “in the nature of a general demurrer to strike the answer filed by” the defendant, and also overruling the “special demurrer and motion to strike” certain .paragraphs of the defendant’s answer. The judgment is not such a. final judgment as would authorize the plaintiff to sue out a direct bill of exceptions; and consequently the writ of error will be dismissed because it was prematurely sued out. Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873); Douglas v. Hardin, 163 Ga. 643 (136 S. E. 793), and cit.; Jennings v. Jennings, 169 Ga. 377 (150 S. E. 552); Berrien County Bank v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 56 (82 S. E. 628); Moncrief v. Rimer, 181 Ga. 4. [6]*6Leave is granted to enter as exceptions pendente lite the official copy of the bill of exceptions retained in the superior court.

No. 10587. August 7, 1935. H. PL. Anderson and Jesse M. Sellers, for plaintiff. W. E. Mann and W. G. Mann, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

The only assignment of error is upon a judgment overruling the plaintiff's motion “in the nature of a general demurrer to strike the answer filed by” the defendant, and also overruling the “special demurrer and motion to strike” certain .paragraphs of the defendant’s answer. The judgment is not such a. final judgment as would authorize the plaintiff to sue out a direct bill of exceptions; and consequently the writ of error will be dismissed because it was prematurely sued out. Johnson v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 141 Ga. 721 (81 S. E. 873); Douglas v. Hardin, 163 Ga. 643 (136 S. E. 793), and cit.; Jennings v. Jennings, 169 Ga. 377 (150 S. E. 552); Berrien County Bank v. Brown, 15 Ga. App. 56 (82 S. E. 628); Moncrief v. Rimer, 181 Ga. 4. [6]*6Leave is granted to enter as exceptions pendente lite the official copy of the bill of exceptions retained in the superior court.

No. 10587. August 7, 1935. H. PL. Anderson and Jesse M. Sellers, for plaintiff. W. E. Mann and W. G. Mann, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.E. 169, 181 Ga. 5, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-headrick-ga-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack