Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, Ltd.

Utah Supreme Court

Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, Ltd.

735 P.2d 33, 53 Utah Adv. Rep. 6, 1987 Utah LEXIS 666

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 4, 1987

DocketNo. 870017

StatusPublished

This text of 735 P.2d 33 (Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregory v. Fourthwest Investments, Ltd., 735 P.2d 33, 53 Utah Adv. Rep. 6, 1987 Utah LEXIS 666 (Utah 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

[34]*34ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In his docketing statement to this Court, counsel for appellant stated that “[jjurisdiction to hear this appeal is conferred on this Court by Rule 3, U.R.A.P.” We informed counsel by telephone that our appellate rules do not confer jurisdiction and requested that he amend the docketing statement, citing section 78-2-2 ¹ of the Judicial Code. His failure to comply with our request constrains us to dismiss the appeal. Utah R.App.P. 9(e).

So ordered.

STEWART, C.J., does not participate herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[34]*34ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In his docketing statement to this Court, counsel for appellant stated that “[jjurisdiction to hear this appeal is conferred on this Court by Rule 3, U.R.A.P.” We informed counsel by telephone that our appellate rules do not confer jurisdiction and requested that he amend the docketing statement, citing section 78-2-2 ¹ of the Judicial Code. His failure to comply with our request constrains us to dismiss the appeal. Utah R.App.P. 9(e).

So ordered.

STEWART, C.J., does not participate herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 P.2d 33, 53 Utah Adv. Rep. 6, 1987 Utah LEXIS 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-fourthwest-investments-ltd-utah-1987.