Gregory v. Edgerly

17 Neb. 373
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Neb. 373 (Gregory v. Edgerly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory v. Edgerly, 17 Neb. 373 (Neb. 1885).

Opinion

By the Court.

The defendant moves to strike certain assignments of error out of the petition in error, upon the ground that they are not authorized by the record. When improper assignments are made they may be stricken out of the petition as irrelevant matter. This practice, however, is not favored, because only the errors relied upon by the plaintiff in error in his brief will be considered, the others being deemed waived. But in no case will the court strike [374]*374out assignments of error where they in any manner bring before the court a question or questions presented by the record. The assignments of error in this case seem to be justified by the record, and therefore, are not irrelevant. The motion is overruled.

Brown & Ryan Brothers, for the motion. John 8. Gregory, contra.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Neb. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-edgerly-neb-1885.