Gregory v. Dean

Eighth Circuit

Gregory v. Dean

14 F. App'x 755

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 30, 2001

DocketNo. 01-1517SD

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F. App'x 755 (Gregory v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gregory v. Dean, 14 F. App'x 755 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[Not To Be Published]

PER CURIAM.

Garland Gregory appeals the District Court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of [756]*756his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. Gregory claimed that his due process rights were violated at a prison disciplinary hearing, which resulted in twenty days in disciplinary segregation. We conclude the District Court did not err in dismissing Gregory’s complaint. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (failure to allow inmate to present witnesses at disciplinary hearing, after which he was placed in disciplinary segregation for 30 days, did not deprive inmate of liberty interest protected by due process); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Not To Be Published]

PER CURIAM.

Garland Gregory appeals the District Court’s¹ 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of [756]*756his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. Gregory claimed that his due process rights were violated at a prison disciplinary hearing, which resulted in twenty days in disciplinary segregation. We conclude the District Court did not err in dismissing Gregory’s complaint. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (failure to allow inmate to present witnesses at disciplinary hearing, after which he was placed in disciplinary segregation for 30 days, did not deprive inmate of liberty interest protected by due process); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (de novo standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F. App'x 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-dean-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack