Gregory v. Cryder

9 Abb. Pr. 89
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 15, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Abb. Pr. 89 (Gregory v. Cryder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory v. Cryder, 9 Abb. Pr. 89 (N.Y. 1870).

Opinion

By the Court. Grover, J. (orally).

It being conceded that this cause is not upon the calendar, we cannot hear it. The rule of court, made some years ago, requires that appeals in non-enumerated motions, as well as others, should be placed upon the calendar; and that rule is still in force.

Pice, for the respondent, suggested that counsel had come from Hew York in anticipation of arguing the appeal, and were ready to waive any objection if they could allowed to do so.

The Chief Justice (after consultation).—The rule precludes an argument of the cause; but under the circumstances of this case, we are disposed to allow it to be submitted upon the points without oral argument, if that be desired.

Counsel not agreeing on a submission, the cause went over.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Abb. Pr. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-cryder-ny-1870.