Gregory v. Brigman

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 18, 2007
DocketI.C. NO. 394443.
StatusPublished

This text of Gregory v. Brigman (Gregory v. Brigman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory v. Brigman, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Opinion

* * * * * * * * * * *
Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal on November 21, 2006. Thereafter, plaintiff failed to file a Form 44, brief, or any other document with the Full Commission setting forth grounds for appeal with particularity.

The Full Commission finds that plaintiff failed to comply with Rule 701 of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Rules by failing to state with particularity the grounds for his appeal. Roberts v. Wal-MartStores, Inc., 173 N.C. App. 740, 619 S.E.2d 907 (2005).

Accordingly, plaintiff's case against defendants is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This the 7th day of May 2007. *Page 2

S/_________________________

DIANNE C. SELLERS

COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_________________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER

S/_________________________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
619 S.E.2d 907 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gregory v. Brigman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-v-brigman-ncworkcompcom-2007.