Gregory v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

144 U.S. 665, 12 S. Ct. 783, 36 L. Ed. 585, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2116
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 25, 1892·No. 292·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion that the questions attempted to be raised by the present suit should have been presented, and can' be effectively determined only in equity cause No. ■ 2170. And such we understand to have been the opinion of the Circuit Judge. But the decree below is, in form, one upon the merits, and might perhaps be pleaded in bar of any claim that Gregory, or Gregory and Jones, might assert in suit No. 2170 to the funds in question. Without passing upon any of the questions raised by the pleadings in. this case, we hold that the decree should have been without prejudice to any right he or they may Have to make such claim in that suit, if they be so advised.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that the decree below be, and the same is hereby, so modified, that the dismissal of the bill of complaint is without prejudice to cmy claim the plaintiffs or either of them may righfully assert in eguity suit No. 2170, in the court below, to the proceeds of the judgment against Swift. The costs of this cou/rt are adjudged to the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 144 U.S. 665, 12 S. Ct. 783, 36 L. Ed. 585, 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2116 (1892).

144 U.S. 665 (Gregory v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. Stone
310 P.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1957)
Degraff v. Smith
157 P.2d 342 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1945)
Midland National Bank v. Hendrickson
200 N.W. 17 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)
Greene v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
124 F. 961 (First Circuit, 1903)
Gregory v. Pike
46 A. 793 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1900)