Gregory Thornton v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gregory Thornton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 6493
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 6, 2013·No. 07-11-00069-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-12-0506-CR

JORGE MUNOZ PALACIOS, APPELLANT V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-11L-182, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding

March 6, 2013

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before this court is a motion to dismiss the appeal signed by both appellant Jorge Munoz Palacios and his attorney. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory Thornton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Gregory Thornton v. State (Gregory Thornton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.