Gregory T. Josefsberg v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 2012·No. 14-12-00613-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed November 20, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00613-CR

GREGORY T. JOSEFSBERG, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 9 Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1816811

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed November 9, 2012. The court has determined that appellant has not substantially complied with Rule 9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In particular, appellant’s brief does not contain appellant’s signature. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.1; see also Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Loc. R. 4(f) (governing signatures on electronically filed documents). The brief also fails to include a certificate of service. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(d)-(e). In addition, the brief is not double-spaced. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(d).

Accordingly, pursuant to Rules 9.4(i) and 38.9(a), the court STRIKES appellant’s brief filed November 9, 2012, and orders appellant to file a corrected brief conforming to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9 and 38 on or before December 7, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i), 38.9(a). If the corrected brief is filed after December 1, 2012, the new requirements set out in the amendments to Rule 9 concerning the length of briefs must be followed. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i) (eff. Dec. 1, 2012) (limiting computer-generated briefs to 15,000 words and requiring a certificate stating the number of words in the document).

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory T. Josefsberg v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Gregory T. Josefsberg v. State (Gregory T. Josefsberg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.