Gregory Smikle v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 23, 2008·No. 13-08-00489-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00489-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

GREGORY SMIKLE, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yanez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Gregory Smikle, attempts to appeal a conviction for assault. The trial

court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.” See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On August 14, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to

whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the

existence of any amended certification.

On September 6, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s

response does not establish: (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is

incorrect, or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 23rd day of October, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory Smikle v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Gregory Smikle v. State (Gregory Smikle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.