Gregory Scott Clanton, Etc. v. Harris County, Texas

893 F.2d 757, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1394, 1990 WL 3292
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1990·No. 89-2232·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Scott Clanton appeals the district court's 12(b)(6) dismissal of his § 1983 claim against Harris County. He sued Harris County for damages arising from State District Judge Albert Pruett’s alleged failure to appoint counsel to defend him from drug charges in timely fashion. A panel of this court recently concluded that Texas district judges act for the state in appointing counsel for indigent criminal defendants, and the county is not responsible under § 1983 for their actions in this regard. Hamill v. Wright, 870 F.2d 1032 (5th Cir.1989). We affirm on that basis. See also Clark v. Tarrant County, 798 F.2d 736, 744 (5th Cir.1986) (Texas district judges “are undeniably state elected officials”); Holloway v. Walker, 765 F.2d 517 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1037, 106 S.Ct. 605, 88 L.Ed.2d 583 (1985); Rheuark v. Shaw, 628 F.2d 297 (5th Cir.1980).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory Scott Clanton, Etc. v. Harris County, Texas, 893 F.2d 757, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1394, 1990 WL 3292 (5th Cir. 1990).

893 F.2d 757 (Gregory Scott Clanton, Etc. v. Harris County, Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daves v. Dallas County
22 F.4th 522 (Fifth Circuit, 2022)
Daves v. Dallas Cty
984 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)
Odonnell v. Harris County
227 F. Supp. 3d 706 (S.D. Texas, 2016)
Davis v. Tarrant County, Tex.
565 F.3d 214 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)