Gregory Reed v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 2024·No. 05-23-00115-CR·Published

Opinion

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed March 27, 2024

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00115-CR

GREGORY REED, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-81787-2022

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garcia, Breedlove, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Garcia Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with affirmative deadly

weapon and family violence findings. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced, at life in prison.

On appeal, appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining

whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). Appellant responded but presents no arguable grounds to advance.

As required, appellant’s counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has provided appellant with a copy of the motion. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). We carried the motion for consideration with the merits.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record before us that arguably might support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Dennise Garcia/

DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 230115F.U05

S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

GREGORY REED, Appellant On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-23-00115-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 380-81787-

2022.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia.

Justices Breedlove and Kennedy participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered March 27, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory Reed v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Gregory Reed v. the State of Texas (Gregory Reed v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re Schulman
252 S.W.3d 403 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Meza v. State
206 S.W.3d 684 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)