Gregory McCain v. State
This text of Gregory McCain v. State (Gregory McCain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00599-CR
GREGORY MCCAIN APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
On December 13, 2013, Appellant Gregory McCain filed a motion for post-
conviction DNA testing and appointment of counsel and also filed a notice of
appeal. The trial court clerk has informed us that the trial judge has not signed
an order in this case. On January 3, 2014, we notified McCain that it appears we
lack jurisdiction over this matter because there is no order and his notice of
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a)(1), 27.1(b). We
advised that this appeal could be dismissed unless he, or any party desiring to
continue the appeal, filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal
on or before January 23, 2014. No response has been filed.
The rules of appellate procedure provide that a criminal defendant has the
right to appeal a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(a)(2). There is no appealable order in this case, and McCain’s notice of
appeal is premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a)(1), 27.1(b).
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: February 20, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory McCain v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-mccain-v-state-texapp-2014.