Gregory M. Crow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

214 F. App'x 626
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 29, 2007·No. 05-4452·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory and Brenda Crow appeal the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their diversity action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart). The Crows sued Wal-Mart following an accident in which Gregory Crow drove a truck into a “Pedestrian Crossing” sign in the Wal-Mart parking lot. The Crows alleged the accident was the result of negligence and carelessness on the part of Wal-Mart.

Upon our de novo review of the record, Engleson v. Little Falls Area Chamber of Commerce, 362 F.3d 525, 528 (8th Cir. 2004), we find summary judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory M. Crow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, 214 F. App'x 626 (8th Cir. 2007).

214 F. App'x 626 (Gregory M. Crow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Engleson v. Little Falls Area Chamber of Commerce
362 F.3d 525 (Eighth Circuit, 2004)