Gregory Lynn Wade v. Kurt Kester
This text of 210 F. App'x 554 (Gregory Lynn Wade v. Kurt Kester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Minnesota inmate Gregory Wade seeks to appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we *555 find that Wade’s notice of appeal (NOA) was untimely by one day because he filed it on April 1, 31 days after the district court entered judgment on March 1, 2005. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (NOA must be filed within 30 days after judgment or order appealed from is entered), 4(c)(1) (prison-mailbox rule). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. See Krein v. Norris, 250 F.3d 1184, 1187 (8th Cir. 2001) (jurisdiction will be raised sua sponte when there is indication it is lacking, even if parties concede issue); Burgs v. Johnson County, Iowa, 79 F.3d 701, 702 (8th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (timely NOA is jurisdictional). We also deny Wade’s motion for appellate counsel.
. The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 F. App'x 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-lynn-wade-v-kurt-kester-ca8-2006.