Gregory Luckman v. Minerva Guadalupe Zamora
Opinion
Opinion issued January 10, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-01021-CV ——————————— GREGORY LUCKMAN, Appellant V. MINERVA GUADALUPE ZAMORA, Appellee
On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2005-50322
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1). The certificate of conference indicates that appellee did not respond to
appellant’s attempt to confer regarding the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a). Ten days have passed, however, and appellee has not filed a response in
opposition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(b) (providing that court may determine
motion before response is filed), 10.3(a) (providing, in pertinent part, that court
should not hear or determine motion until 10 days after motion was filed, unless
motion states that parties have conferred and that no party opposes motion). No
opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gregory Luckman v. Minerva Guadalupe Zamora (Gregory Luckman v. Minerva Guadalupe Zamora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.