Gregory Lucas v. Carly Hillenbrand, et al.
This text of Gregory Lucas v. Carly Hillenbrand, et al. (Gregory Lucas v. Carly Hillenbrand, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
GREGORY LUCAS, Plaintiff CV 25-24-BU-DWM
VS. CARLY HILLENBRAND, et al., ORDER
Defendants.
On November 12, 2025, Defendant Amergis Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. f/k/a Maxim Healthcare Staffing, Inc. (“Maxim Healthcare”) moved for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 36.) On November 17, 2025, Defendant
Sunbelt Staffing, LLC joined this motion. (Doc. 40.) On this same day, Plaintiff Gregory Lucas filed an Amended Complaint. (Doc. 41.) Because “an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading,” Koala v. Khosla, 931 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2019), IT IS ORDERED that Maxim Healthcare’s motion, (Doc. 36.), is DENIED
as MOOT. Maxim Healthcare must answer the Amended Complaint or once again
move for judgment on the pleadings by the deadline provided in Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. we DATED this_/@_ day of November, 2025.
Donald W. Molley, District Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory Lucas v. Carly Hillenbrand, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-lucas-v-carly-hillenbrand-et-al-mtd-2025.