Gregory Lucas v. Carly Hillenbrand, et al.

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

GREGORY LUCAS, Plaintiff CV 25-24-BU-DWM

VS. CARLY HILLENBRAND, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

On November 12, 2025, Defendant Amergis Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. f/k/a Maxim Healthcare Staffing, Inc. (“Maxim Healthcare”) moved for judgment on the pleadings. (Doc. 36.) On November 17, 2025, Defendant

Sunbelt Staffing, LLC joined this motion. (Doc. 40.) On this same day, Plaintiff Gregory Lucas filed an Amended Complaint. (Doc. 41.) Because “an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading,” Koala v. Khosla, 931 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2019), IT IS ORDERED that Maxim Healthcare’s motion, (Doc. 36.), is DENIED

as MOOT. Maxim Healthcare must answer the Amended Complaint or once again

move for judgment on the pleadings by the deadline provided in Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. we DATED this_/@_ day of November, 2025.

Donald W. Molley, District Judge United States District Court