Gregory Lewis Harvey v. Edward Murray Court and Legal Services
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory Lewis HARVEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY; Court and Legal Services, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-7012.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 25, 1993.
Decided Nov. 19, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke, No. CA-93-663-R; James C. Turk, District Judge.
Gregory Lewis Harvey, pro se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harvey v. Murray, No. CA-93-663-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
12 F.3d 204 (Gregory Lewis Harvey v. Edward Murray Court and Legal Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.