Gregory Lane Pitts v. David A. Garraghty
This text of 812 F.2d 1401 (Gregory Lane Pitts v. David A. Garraghty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
812 F.2d 1401
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gregory Lane PITTS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David A. GARRAGHTY, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 86-7739.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 31, 1986.
Decided Feb. 25, 1987.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
Gregory Lane Pitts, appellant pro se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pitts v. Garraghty, C/A No. 85-1018-AM (E.D.Va., Oct. 21, 1986).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
812 F.2d 1401, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2494, 1987 WL 36477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-lane-pitts-v-david-a-garraghty-ca4-1987.