Gregory John George v. State
This text of Gregory John George v. State (Gregory John George v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00172-CR ____________________
GREGORY JOHN GEORGE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08-03474 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Gregory John George pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to aggravated
assault. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed him on
unadjudicated community supervision for ten years. After the State filed a motion
to revoke, the trial court found George violated terms of the community
supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to twenty years in prison.
1 George’s appellate counsel filed a brief stating his opinion that there are no
arguable points of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v.
State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). This Court granted an extension of
time for appellant to file a pro se response. We received no response from
appellant.
The Court of Criminal Appeals has explained that an appellate court may
determine in an Anders case either (1) “that the appeal is wholly frivolous and
issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible
error”; or (2) “that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the
trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues.” Bledsoe v.
State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
We have reviewed the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and the Anders
brief. Based on that review, we conclude that, in view of Chapter 46B of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, arguable grounds for appeal exist regarding the competency
of George to stand trial. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 46B.002, 46B.003
(West 2006), art. 46B.004 (West Supp. 2013), art. 46B.005 (West 2006); see also
Turner v. State, No. AP-76,580, 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1592 (Tex. Crim.
App. Oct. 30, 2013).
2 We grant appellate counsel permission to withdraw as counsel of record,
abate the appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for appointment of new
counsel to re-brief the appeal and raise any arguable issues, including the
competency-to-stand-trial issue. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826-27; Stafford v.
State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Upon remand, the trial
court shall direct the new counsel to file appellant’s brief within thirty days after
the appointment. The trial court shall furnish the name, address, telephone number,
and state bar number of new counsel to the Clerk of this Court immediately after
the appointment is ordered.
ORDER ENTERED February 6, 2014.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory John George v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-john-george-v-state-texapp-2014.