Gregory Joe Wickline v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, Acting for and on Behalf of Oklahoma State University And James Michael Holder, in His Individual Capacity and in His Capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director Of

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 8, 2016
Docket03-15-00077-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gregory Joe Wickline v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, Acting for and on Behalf of Oklahoma State University And James Michael Holder, in His Individual Capacity and in His Capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director Of (Gregory Joe Wickline v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, Acting for and on Behalf of Oklahoma State University And James Michael Holder, in His Individual Capacity and in His Capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director Of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory Joe Wickline v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, Acting for and on Behalf of Oklahoma State University And James Michael Holder, in His Individual Capacity and in His Capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director Of, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 8, 2016

NO. 03-15-00077-CV

Gregory Joe Wickline, Appellant

v.

Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, acting for and on behalf of Oklahoma State University; and James Michael Holder, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director of Intercollegiate Athletics for Oklahoma State University, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND DISMISSED ON AGREED MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 23, 2015. Appellant has

filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees

that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the

appeal. Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the

court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gregory Joe Wickline v. Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges, Acting for and on Behalf of Oklahoma State University And James Michael Holder, in His Individual Capacity and in His Capacity as Vice President for Athletic Programs and Director Of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-joe-wickline-v-board-of-regents-for-the-oklahoma-agricultural-and-texapp-2016.