Gregory Humphrey v. Major Huffnian; Deputy Johnson; and Deputy Mareno

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION GREGORY HUMPHREY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 126-001 ) MAJOR HUFFNIAN; DEPUTY JOHNSON; ) and DEPUTY MARENO, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this /eotkday of February, 2026, at Augusta, Georgia.

EC RABLE J. RANDAL HALL JY STATES DISTRICT JUDGE OUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA