Gregory Henderson v. Cathy Henderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 23, 2021·No. A21A1679·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 14, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1679. GREGORY HENDERSON v. CATHY HENDERSON.

Cathy Henderson obtained a family violence protective order against her husband, Gregory Henderson, who then filed this direct appeal. However, appeals of orders in domestic relations cases—including actions arising under the Family Violence Act, OCGA § 19-13-1 et seq.—must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2); Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), disapproved in part on other grounds by Gilliam v. State, __ Ga. __ (Case No. S21A0941, decided June 21, 2021). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Gregory Henderson’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/14/2021

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gregory Henderson v. Cathy Henderson, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Gregory Henderson v. Cathy Henderson (Gregory Henderson v. Cathy Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)