Gregory H. Reagan v. Ruby Hazel Morgan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2006
Docket14-05-00558-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Gregory H. Reagan v. Ruby Hazel Morgan (Gregory H. Reagan v. Ruby Hazel Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gregory H. Reagan v. Ruby Hazel Morgan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00558-CV

GREGORY H. REAGAN, Appellant

V.

RUBY HAZEL MORGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 836,298

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 20, 2005.  Gregory H. Reagan filed a notice of appeal from the trial court=s judgment granting Ruby Hazel Morgan possession of 2809 Thomas Avenue, his former residence.  On December 2, 2005, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds the case is moot.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  Because the question of possession is moot, we dismiss the appeal.


An action for forcible detainer is intended to be a summary, speedy, and inexpensive remedy.  See McGlothlin v. Kliebert, 672 S.W.2d 231, 232 (Tex.1984).  For that reason, a county court=s judgment may not be stayed pending appeal unless a supersedeas bond is filed by appellant within ten days of the judgment being signed.  Tex. Prop. Code Ann. ' 24.007 (Vernon 2000).  Otherwise, the judgment may not be stayed and the prevailing party may move to take possession.  See McCartney v. California Mortgage Serv., 951 S.W.2d 549, 550 (Tex.App.‑‑El Paso 1997, no writ).  Once this has occurred, the case becomes moot because a justiciable controversy must exist at every stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal.  See Shelby Operating Co. v. City of Waskom, 964 S.W.2d 75, 81 (Tex.App.‑‑Texarkana 1997, pet. denied); Zimmerman v. Ottis, 941 S.W.2d 259, 263 (Tex.App.‑‑Corpus Christi 1996, no writ); James v. Hubbard, 21 S.W.3d 558, 560 (Tex.App.‑‑San Antonio 2000, no pet.).  We are prohibited from deciding moot controversies.  See National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex.1999).

The record does not show Reagan filed a supersedeas bond.  On October 7, 2005, writ of possession was issued.  A certified copy of the officer=s return reflects Reagan voluntarily removed himself from the premises.  Accordingly, the case is moot.  See Kemper v. Stonegate Manor Apartments, Ltd., 29 S.W.3d 362, 363 (Tex.App.‑Beaumont 2000, no pet.).

We therefore grant appellee=s motion and order the appeal dismissed.

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Guzman.        

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kemper v. Stonegate Manor Apartments, Ltd.
29 S.W.3d 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
McGlothlin v. Kliebert
672 S.W.2d 231 (Texas Supreme Court, 1984)
Zimmerman v. Ottis
941 S.W.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones
1 S.W.3d 83 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
James v. Hubbard
21 S.W.3d 558 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
McCartney v. California Mortgage Service
951 S.W.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Shelby Operating Co. v. City of Waskom
964 S.W.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gregory H. Reagan v. Ruby Hazel Morgan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-h-reagan-v-ruby-hazel-morgan-texapp-2006.