Gregory G Sinicropi v. Holly v. Mazurek
This text of Gregory G Sinicropi v. Holly v. Mazurek (Gregory G Sinicropi v. Holly v. Mazurek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
October 3, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
137061 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. GREGORY G. SINICROPI, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 137061 COA: 281726 Jackson CC: 05-002154-DP HOLLY V. MAZUREK,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
MARTIN A. POWERS,
Intervening
Defendant-Appellee.
_____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to address the constitutional due process issues related to the rights of the biological father.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 3, 2008 _________________________________________ l0930 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gregory G Sinicropi v. Holly v. Mazurek, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gregory-g-sinicropi-v-holly-v-mazurek-mich-2008.